Law Minister Kiren Rijiju says, it is a “matter of grave concern” over SC’s move of making IB, RAW reports public.

The
Union Law Minister Kiren Rijiju on Tuesday expressed concern over the Supreme
Court Collegium decision to make the Research and Analysis Wing (RAW) and the
Intelligence Bureau (IB) inputs on appointment of judges in the High Courts in
the public domain.
The
Union Minister says it is a “matter of grave concern” and that he will react to
it in an appropriate time.
“Putting
the secret or sensitive reports of the RAW or IB (on the appointment of judges
in high courts) in public domain is a matter of grave concern which I will
react in an appropriate time,” Rijuju said.
"If
the concerned officer who is working for the nation in disguise or secret mode
in a very secretive location, he will think twice if tomorrow his report is put
out in the public domain, and it will have implications. That is why I will not
make any comment," Rijiju added.
When
asked whether the Union Minister would discuss it with the Chief Justice, he
said: "The Chief Justice and I meet so often. We are always in touch. He
is the head of the judiciary, I am the bridge between the government and the
judiciary. We have to work together - we can't work in isolation. It is a
contentious issue...let's leave it for another day."
This
comes amidst the ongoing controversy between the Government and the Supreme
Court over the collegium system and also at a time after the Supreme Court
collegium headed by the Chief Justice of India, DY Chandrachud, last week,
published on the Supreme Court website the government's objections for the
appointment of three candidates for judge and its own counter.
On
January 19, the Supreme Court had made public the government's objections to
the elevation of three candidates, including an openly gay advocate, as judges.
The
revelation caused concern within the security establishment as it has
traditionally been customary for intelligence agencies to screen applicants for
nominations to the High Court and Supreme Court in confidence.
The
ongoing controversy between the Government and the Supreme Court is that the
government is of the opinion that the government should also have a crucial
role in the appointment of judges which has been the role of the Supreme Court
collegium or panel of senior most judges since 1993.
The
government argues that the legislature is supreme since it represents the will
of the people.
The
controversy between the two has also thrown up questions on the constitution
and what parts of it can be changed by parliament to rework the system of
judges appointing judges.
The
Supreme Court has said the collegium system is the "law of the land"
which should be "followed to the teeth".
Mr
Rijiju has often talked about the "lack of transparency" in the
appointment of judges. Yesterday, he said judges need not contest elections of
face public scrutiny.
"The
people are watching you and judging you. Your judgments, your work process, how
you dispense justice... The people can see, and assess... They form
opinions," the Law Minister said at an event.
The
minister said this while interacting with the media at an award felicitation
ceremony held at Jaisalmer House to honour the award winners of eCourts Project
organised by the Department of Justice.
(Source-
ANI/NDTV)
Post your Comment